Skip to content
Thirty-seven degrees Celsius. That is the number hanging over the Southern Kingdom this Wednesday like a particularly unsubtle threat from the heavens. This Author does not exaggerate when she reports that scientists at the Meteorological Office have declared the margin by which this June record will be broken to be “extraordinary” – and if the finest minds in climate science are reaching for superlatives, Gentle Reader, perhaps we ought to listen. Before 1990, the Kingdom had never once seen 37C. Six of the past ten years have exceeded 35C. At the current pace of warming, the mid-forties could arrive by 2050. One shudders, though admittedly not because of the cold.
From heat of the meteorological variety, This Author turns to heat of the political kind. Lord Starmer, having announced his resignation as Prime Minister on Monday, now governs in the manner of a guest who has announced his departure but remains firmly occupying the best chair. The Prime Minister’s Residence confirms the long-awaited defence investment plan will be published before the Nato summit on 7 July in Turkey – despite two defence ministers having already resigned in protest at it, and despite the very real possibility that whoever inherits the chair will wish to revise the entire thing. Commitment to a plan that one’s own ministers fled and one’s successor may discard entirely: a bold strategy, one must concede.
Into this vacancy strides Lord Burnham, the newly minted MP for Makerfield and, thus far, the sole declared aspirant to the highest office in the land. The Broadcasting Society understands he is expected to show Lady Reeves to a slightly smaller chair – removing her from the Royal Exchequer in favour of something more junior. A close ally of Lord Burnham assures us he “really respects” Lady Reeves. This Author has heard warmer eulogies at funerals. Meanwhile, Lord Jones ruled himself out of the leadership race on this very Wednesday, leaving Lord Burnham so unchallenged he may simply stroll into the Prime Minister’s Residence by 17 July with no one to wave him in but the doorman. Names mooted for the chancellorship include Lord Miliband, Lord Streeting, Lord Healey, and Lady Cooper – a roster of possibilities so varied one almost suspects a game of pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey is planned.
This Author turns now to matters of the gravest weight, and sets aside any impulse toward levity entirely. The national inquiry into grooming gangs has at last announced its first locations: Oldham-upon-Hill, Bradford, Keighley, and the Capital. The inquiry, chaired by Baroness Anne Longfield, will compel individuals and institutions to account for what they “did or did not do to protect children from being sexually abused.” Eight hundred recommendations have already been identified by the inquiry, yet there has been, in the inquiry’s own words, “significant inconsistency” in how they have been implemented. Bradford, survivors note, has evaded proper scrutiny for years. The chair has expressed her hope that this inquiry will be the last of its kind ever needed. That hope is the most important sentence written in the Kingdom this Wednesday.
From national reckoning to personal tragedy: newly disclosed evidence in the case of young Henry Nowak reveals that police officers took eight minutes to discover the fatal stab wound in his chest after arriving at the scene in Southampton last December. In that time, Vickrum Digwa was lying to officers, claiming he himself had been attacked – and so the eighteen-year-old’s pleas that he had “been stabbed” were, to the officers’ later horror, disbelieved. Efforts to save Henry continued for fifty-one minutes after the wound was found. He died at 00:37 on 4 December 2025. The bodycam footage, released exclusively to the Broadcasting Society with the blessing of Henry’s family, makes clear the officer’s genuine shock upon realising he had been performing CPR on a young man with a serious chest wound. There are no witty asides to be drawn from this. There is only the record, and the grief, and the absolute necessity of accounting for it.
On a note only marginally lighter – for the news today does not readily permit full brightness – This Author draws the Gentle Reader’s attention to a new study from Columbia University, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, which has arrived to inform us all that we ought to stand up from our chairs every hour and take a five-minute walk. Over eleven thousand office workers were surveyed to reach this conclusion. Five minutes. Every hour. The researchers call these “movement snacks,” a phrase so cheerful it almost compensates for the preceding findings. Those who attempted a stroll every half hour found it disruptive; every two hours, insufficient. One hour was judged the ideal interval for improving mood, reducing fatigue, and maintaining the appearance of diligence. This Author notes, with some satisfaction, that the act of composing this very column has required no fewer than four agitated circuits of the writing room already – placing her, for once, firmly ahead of the scientific consensus.
I am, as ever, your most devoted observer – Lady Whistledown.