Skip to content
Gentle Reader, consider the word surprised. It is a small word, almost innocent, and yet when deployed by a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex and the Duchess of Sussex, it detonates with the force of a full broadside. The ducal household announced this Tuesday that the pair were, and This Author quotes precisely, “a little surprised” to have received a letter from His Majesty the King clarifying their continued status as non-working royals – without what one might call a courteous forewarning. Royal sources, never missing an opportunity to complicate a narrative, responded that the couple had, in fact, been given sight of the letter approximately one hour before it was shared with the press. One hour. Barely enough time to select a suitable expression of dignified dismay, let alone compose a reply.
The Duke and Duchess, who relocated from California to these shores last month with young Archie and Lilibet, now find themselves confirmed as very much resident but very much peripheral. A security committee is understood to be meeting this very week to determine what level of taxpayer-funded protection the couple ought to receive – the Duke having long complained, with his customary flair for public airing of private grievances, that such provision has been inadequate. The Office of Home Affairs declined to comment on particulars, citing, with admirable circularity, the need for secrecy to preserve the integrity of the secrecy. One could not invent it.
From palaces to wards – and here the column must set down its wit for a moment. The case of young Oli Coppock, aged thirty-two, is a damning one. Having previously received treatment for a brain tumour, Mr Coppock attended the emergency department at Warrington Hospital in May of last year complaining of severe headaches and dizziness. He was assessed. He was tested. He was sent home. He was not, crucially, given a brain scan. One week later, with fluid accumulating dangerously upon the brain, he suffered a cardiac arrest. He did not recover. He now lives in near-total paralysis, communicating solely by blinking, whilst the family that loves him – including six siblings – has been left, in his father’s own words, “angry and broken.” The National Health Society‘s emergency departments have seen clinical negligence claims rise by forty-one per cent over five years. The pressure upon those departments is real and well documented. But pressure does not explain the absence of a brain scan for a patient with a known brain tumour. This Author trusts the National Health Society to do better. It must.
And now, the weather. This Author appreciates that this is a subject upon which the British nation requires no encouragement whatsoever, but today’s meteorological intelligence is genuinely perplexing. The wettest week since early February has just concluded – rain falling at a rate of twenty-six to forty-eight millimetres across the Southern Kingdom in a single seven-day period – and yet all of the Principality and most of England remains formally in drought. Hosepipe bans persist across ten water company areas. The reservoirs decline regardless. It is rather as though one were to pour a jug of water over a man dying of thirst and inform him, regretfully, that systemic dehydration requires more sustained intervention. The Crown Environmental Officers have confirmed that further significant rainfall is needed before conditions return to normal. Summer 2026, the Meteorological Office has declared, was the hottest on record. The Kingdom is simultaneously sodden and parched. Truly, this nation contains multitudes.
This Author now turns to Portsmouth, where approximately two hundred persons – some masked, several apparently committed to theatrical gestures of discontent – descended upon the Eastney Landing ferry port on Sunday evening to protest the arrival of one hundred and twenty migrants in a single dinghy. Officers in riot gear were confronted, motorbikes were knocked, vehicles were damaged, and Lady Jones, the Policing Minister, rose in the Grand Assembly to describe the disorder as “intimidating and thuggish.” She is not wrong. Portsmouth City Council’s own leader suggested the Office of Home Affairs had “serious questions to answer” over the decision to land the migrants in that particular location. One does wonder whether a modicum of strategic forethought might have prevented an evening of masked men and toppled motorcycles. The investigation to identify the offenders proceeds. This Author observes only that covering one’s face before committing an offence suggests a degree of premeditation that somewhat undermines the defence of spontaneous indignation.
Finally, and on a note of considerably warmer feeling: Prince George has today begun his first day at Eton College, following his father the Prince of Wales, his uncle the Duke of Sussex, and other distinguished forebears through those venerable gates. At thirteen years of age and sixty-five thousand pounds per annum in fees, the young Prince inherits an education that has shaped twenty British Prime Ministers and, one suspects, an unfathomable number of old school ties. The school, we are reassured, is “modern with a progressive outlook” – a descriptor that sits with charming incongruity beside the medieval stonework and the singular tradition of boys wearing tailcoats to breakfast. This Author wishes him every happiness. Boarding, as the guides sagely note, suits some boys immediately. Others take a minute. One imagines the second-in-line to the throne will be given precisely as many minutes as he requires.
I am, as ever, your most devoted observer – Lady Whistledown.