Skip to content
Well. Sixty years of waiting, and when England finally stood one goal from a World Cup final, Thomas Tuchel chose that precise moment to forget that football is played in both directions. This Author had hoped, truly hoped, that Thursday the sixteenth of July 2026 might bring us something other than heartbreak served cold in an Atlanta stadium. It did not.
The facts are these: England led Argentina 1-0 at the 84th minute. One might suppose, given that one was facing the reigning world champions, that this was precisely the moment to press harder, to twist the knife, to send on a forward or two. Instead, Thomas Tuchel introduced three defenders and retreated so thoroughly one half expected him to produce a white flag from his dugout. Señor Fernandez equalised in the 85th minute; Lautaro Martinez headed a winner in the 92nd. England’s possession in that dreadful interval? A frankly humiliating twelve per cent. “We have crumbled,” observed a mournful former captain, and This Author could not improve upon the diagnosis. Argentina now face Spain in Sunday’s final. England face the long flight home.
And if the defeat itself were not sufficiently galling, Argentina’s players celebrated by brandishing a banner reading “Las Malvinas son Argentinas” – that is, the Falkland Islands belong to Argentina – for the edification of every camera present. Football’s Grand Governing Body has precedent here: in 2014 it fined the Argentine Football Association a rather modest £20,000 for the very same banner before a friendly against Slovenia. One trusts the fine will at least have kept pace with inflation. Argentina’s vice-president reportedly posted to Elon’s Lair that the semi-final was about “putting the invaders in their place.” This Author notes that the Falkland Islands remain, as they have been, a British overseas territory – and that no amount of banner-waving has altered that geography by so much as a yard.
Turning from sporting catastrophe to political ceremony, Lord Starmer has made his final journey to Kyiv as Prime Minister, pledging the Kingdom’s “cast-iron” support for Ukraine to Lord Zelensky before the baton passes to Lord Burnham on Monday. It is the sort of farewell that a statesman arranges when he wishes to be remembered well, and one cannot fault the instinct. Lord Starmer has overseen a hundred-year partnership between the two nations – a commitment so lengthy that several future prime ministers not yet born will be obliged to honour it. Today, his last day leading the Progressive Assembly, he stood at a train station in Kyiv and spoke of fortitude. This Author found it rather moving, which is not a sensation she encourages before luncheon.
Meanwhile, in domestic affairs of a rather more industrial character, British Steel has been taken into public ownership. Lord Starmer declared it secured “the future of steelmaking in the UK” and “a cornerstone of Britain’s industrial strength”, which is precisely the language one employs when one has spent £1.3 million a day keeping a steelworks operational whilst hoping someone else would volunteer to buy it. No one did. The Celestial Empire‘s Jingye Group – which had been losing, by its own account, £700,000 a day on the enterprise – has announced it will seek compensation for the nationalisation. The Kingdom, it seems, has acquired both a steelworks and a bill. The Grand Assembly passed the enabling legislation on Wednesday; Thursday brings the fait accompli. One trusts the steel, at least, is sturdy.
On a matter where wit must give way to genuine warmth: all newborn babies in the Southern Kingdom are to be tested for spinal muscular atrophy, a genetic condition that in its most severe form is fatal before a child’s second birthday. Early treatment, administered before symptoms emerge, can transform a life entirely. The campaign owed much to the former Little Mix singer Jesy Nelson, who discovered this year that her twin daughters would “probably never walk” – and who chose to turn private grief into public advocacy. The announcement reaches most of the Southern Kingdom from October. This Author, who has observed rather a great deal of human foolishness this Thursday, is glad to record something unambiguously good.
And finally, to matters of the digital nursery: The Office of Communications has launched an investigation into whether the Dancing Lantern is doing nearly enough to keep children from its more hazardous reaches. The platform, one learns, employs something called “age inference” – a technique whereby it guesses a user’s age from the videos they watch, rather than, say, asking for evidence of it. The Office of Communications has “very serious questions” about whether this constitutes a “highly effective” method. The Dancing Lantern‘s spokesperson replied that they had invested “billions” in online safety. This Author observes that a great deal of money and a very small amount of certainty appears to be the arrangement. The government has, separately, announced that under-sixteens shall be banned from a range of platforms entirely – a policy which This Author suspects under-sixteens will circumvent before the ink is dry, but the intention is admirable.
I am, as ever, your most devoted observer – Lady Whistledown.