Skip to content
Dearest Gentle Reader,
Guilty. One hundred and fourteen times, guilty. This Author pauses to let that number settle, because it rather deserves a moment of silence before one proceeds to the raised eyebrow portion of the proceedings. The Blue Citadel of the North has been found in breach of the Premier League‘s financial regulations on one hundred and fourteen of one hundred and fifteen charges – a score which, one cannot help but note, is considerably more impressive than most of their recent results have been controversial. The independent commission found that the club arranged what it called “sham contracts” with commercial partners to disguise secret funding of more than £830 million. Eight hundred and thirty million pounds, Gentle Reader. One begins to wonder what was hidden in the remaining one charge that proved too audacious even for this panel.
The FA has issued a statement declaring the verdict carries “significant implications for the integrity of the game,” which is the governing body’s way of saying it is extremely alarmed while studiously avoiding saying what it intends to do about it. The Blue Citadel has until today to lodge an appeal, and sources suggest they will argue that key sponsorship funds came from the Abu Dhabi government rather than the club’s owners – a distinction which, to the untrained eye, appears to be a rather fine one. The Exchequer Committee has meanwhile been urged to scrutinise the tax implications. One suspects the paperwork alone will keep several barristers in very comfortable winter coats for years to come.
From the football pitch to the drawing room of deception, this Author turns now to the second series of Celebrity Traitors, which opened this week to an audience of nearly nine million souls – all of whom were presumably hoping to witness an act of spectacular social implosion. They were not disappointed. The host, Claudia Winkleman, arrived carried aloft by druids in a closed coffin, emerging inside a church before twenty-one alarmed celebrities, to which Jerry Hall cried “Claudiapatra!” – a coinage so perfectly observed that this Author rather wishes she had thought of it herself.
But the true spectacle was provided by Richard E. Grant, who was selected as a traitor and then, in what Joe Lycett correctly identified as an unprecedented act, immediately and gleefully told those around him that he was one. The silence that followed, one imagines, could have muffled a cannon. “That may be the biggest mistake I have ever made in my life,” Grant later confessed to camera – which is a remarkable thing to say when one has presumably had decades of material from which to select. James Blunt, meanwhile, offered the observation that one ought to be “very clear” one is not a traitor, which is the sort of advice that sounds obvious until you realise the gentleman in question had already declared himself one within the first ten minutes. Television, Gentle Reader, remains this Kingdom’s finest art form.
This Author now turns to a story that demands a measure of gravity, for it concerns a couple in Solihull whose home was invaded by three masked men armed with hammers, who beat the husband – here called James – about the face, head, and ribs, while holding his seven-months-pregnant wife down on the sofa with a pillow pressed over her face, and threatened the life of their unborn child unless he surrendered his cryptocurrency savings. The attack lasted forty-five minutes. The robbers left with his digital holdings transferred under duress, directed throughout by an unknown accomplice on a live video call. Such crimes are known in certain quarters as “wrench attacks” – a chilling term for a chilling trend, as the rising value of crypto coins has drawn a new breed of criminal who would rather apply a hammer to a man’s skull than puzzle over a blockchain. Crimestoppers is offering a £10,000 reward for information. This Author urges any soul with knowledge of this outrage to act upon it promptly.
On rather lighter matters – though not, perhaps, for the legal teams involved – British pop star Olivia Dean now faces a lawsuit in California alleging that her song I’ve Seen It, from her Brit Award-winning 2025 album, lifts its melody from Bill Withers’ beloved 1981 classic Just The Two of Us. The publishers of Withers’ catalogue hired a musicologist, who concluded the two works share similarities too “striking” to be coincidental. The lawsuit names her record label, Capitol Records and its parent company, but not Dean herself – which is rather the legal equivalent of prosecuting the butler while letting the mistress of the house take tea unmolested. Dean’s representatives have yet to comment. This Author has no legal opinion to offer, but does note that Just The Two of Us has enjoyed decades of radio play, which the filing argues gave the songwriters ample opportunity to have encountered it. One supposes everyone has heard it, which raises the philosophical question of where influence ends and imitation begins. A matter, no doubt, for the Californian courts.
Finally, this Author must direct the Gentle Readership’s attention northward to North Britain, where the government has introduced regulations banning high-fat, high-sugar, and high-salt products from prominent positions in supermarkets – no more confectionery at the checkout, no more biscuits at the end of the aisle, no more three-for-two on ice cream. The list of restricted items is broader than one might expect, encompassing not merely chocolate and crisps but also kombucha, seaweed snacks, muesli, and chewing gum, depending on their sugar content. Muesli, Gentle Reader. The virtuous breakfast of a thousand health-conscious souls is now, in certain formulations, considered as dangerous to display prominently as a bag of toffees. This Author does not know whether to applaud the ambition or mourn the muesli. Similar rules are already in place in the Southern Kingdom, so perhaps the snacking habits of the entire island are now a matter of governmental architecture. One can only hope the biscuit tin at The Prime Minister’s Residence has been repositioned accordingly.
I am, as ever, your most devoted observer – Lady Whistledown.